Wednesday, March 8, 2006
doodle, yes
Labels:
doodles
Saturday, March 4, 2006
couples
you, and you, and me?
i’m sick of couples. there needs to be a bit more compassion toward the single persons in this day and age. couples do as they please, bicker and whine at will, and seem to be taking my current world by storm.
it all started way back in the early days of high school. girls started becoming more interesting than video games, music, cars, and sports. well, for my friends that is. i obsessed about girls just as much as the rest of my peers, however i obsessed equally about car stereos, horsepower, videos, computers, and other interests. most of my friends pseudo shared these interests, with me. the other 85% of their time not spent with friends talking about kenwood’s newest model of amplifier, they were focused on girls. or worse yet, they were spending time with their girlfriend.
every guy does the same old act, we do it -we know it, yet we do it anyhow. guys bitch and moan to their friends, complaining about some prior engagement with their girlfriend that prohibits them from partaking in any of the upcoming weekend’s planned activities. they swear that she’s insane and that he’s this close to just letting her go due to her outrageous demands. of course, you and i know this is not the case. he’s dying to snuggle with her and a dvd just as bad as she is, even if it is maid in manhattan that they’re watching.
my tone may sound a bit bitter towards couples in general. and granted i’m not jumping for joy that my friends have significant others, but i am not bitter/jaded/jealous/etc…
all i ask is one simple requisition. leave me alone!
is it too much to ask to just let me be? singles let’s unite, doubles go find a room. far too many of my friends only make appearances in pairs. it’s as if the coupleness blinds them from the fact that being a 3rd wheel is not the ideal friday night for your neighborhood single (read: me). they selfishly want to spend time with their friends while bringing along their better (or worse) half. that’s having cake then eating it too, which i’m told is not allowed.
i find that couples repel me from daily activities i would normally enjoy. the list starts at talking, watching tv, eating, cooking, and ends at being in the same room with other human beings. i just don’t like spending time with couples, simple.
thing is, this year started off with a game of pictionary, two couples, and me. yes that was my new years eve activity, hello 2006. of course with 5 people, one team had unfair advantage to win, and when we did (guys v girls) of course they complained that the teams weren’t fair. way to go compassionate couples, i’ll just dig a hole right here and jump on in.
even on the rare occasion that i get a coupled friend alone for some good ol hanging out, the bulk of their conversation encompasses that other person. it’s as if they know i’m not 3rd wheel, and sense that i miss being in 3rd position.
i suppose there’s only one remedy to the issue at hand here, excommunicate all that are coupled. thing is, i have a tiny reserve against deleting 95% of my address book. i suppose worse things have happened to people less deserving.
i’m sick of couples. there needs to be a bit more compassion toward the single persons in this day and age. couples do as they please, bicker and whine at will, and seem to be taking my current world by storm.
it all started way back in the early days of high school. girls started becoming more interesting than video games, music, cars, and sports. well, for my friends that is. i obsessed about girls just as much as the rest of my peers, however i obsessed equally about car stereos, horsepower, videos, computers, and other interests. most of my friends pseudo shared these interests, with me. the other 85% of their time not spent with friends talking about kenwood’s newest model of amplifier, they were focused on girls. or worse yet, they were spending time with their girlfriend.
every guy does the same old act, we do it -we know it, yet we do it anyhow. guys bitch and moan to their friends, complaining about some prior engagement with their girlfriend that prohibits them from partaking in any of the upcoming weekend’s planned activities. they swear that she’s insane and that he’s this close to just letting her go due to her outrageous demands. of course, you and i know this is not the case. he’s dying to snuggle with her and a dvd just as bad as she is, even if it is maid in manhattan that they’re watching.
my tone may sound a bit bitter towards couples in general. and granted i’m not jumping for joy that my friends have significant others, but i am not bitter/jaded/jealous/etc…
all i ask is one simple requisition. leave me alone!

i find that couples repel me from daily activities i would normally enjoy. the list starts at talking, watching tv, eating, cooking, and ends at being in the same room with other human beings. i just don’t like spending time with couples, simple.
thing is, this year started off with a game of pictionary, two couples, and me. yes that was my new years eve activity, hello 2006. of course with 5 people, one team had unfair advantage to win, and when we did (guys v girls) of course they complained that the teams weren’t fair. way to go compassionate couples, i’ll just dig a hole right here and jump on in.
even on the rare occasion that i get a coupled friend alone for some good ol hanging out, the bulk of their conversation encompasses that other person. it’s as if they know i’m not 3rd wheel, and sense that i miss being in 3rd position.
i suppose there’s only one remedy to the issue at hand here, excommunicate all that are coupled. thing is, i have a tiny reserve against deleting 95% of my address book. i suppose worse things have happened to people less deserving.
Labels:
Hunger 1
Sunday, February 26, 2006
olympics
anti-olympian
i’ve decided after years and years, that i do not like the olympics. how can one not like the olympics you ask? i feel that the olympics are childish, outdated, and most of all –not-entertaining.
childish you say? how can “the games” be childish? the top of the top, best of the best, competing for the world title: a gold metal, (yea i said childish). i grew out of footraces, distance throwing, and racing downhill in sleds while i was still in grade school. 5th graders these days are busy talking about psp games, or if who of their friends has a real playboy magazine. ice skating races, please.
there are some competitions that are not so simple, say hockey, or snow boarding. i’ve seen professional hockey, and snowboarding videos galore. the pros are super good at this stuff, but the olympic contenders aren’t pros. they suck in comparison! olympic contenders are the best amateurs at what they do. who wants to watch the best mediocre athletes? not i said the anti olympic tv viewer, not i.
events like the downhill skiing competition are interesting, for the first run. but after you see one run, you’ve seen them all. the camera angles don’t change, the costume colors may, but that’s hardly enough to captivate my adolescent attention span.
granted, the olympics were not always a waste of time. back in ancient greece, i’m sure the olympics were everyone’s year highlight. i figure that now, most of the olympics game spectators sit on their couch watching the games in-between commercials of seinfeld reruns.
but back in days of old, in order to see the games, you had to attend the games. now i’ve never sat thru an entire baseball game viewed on tv, (or an entire inning for that matter). but i love going to baseball games. the crowd, the noise, the hype, it all adds to what would be a very dull experience. strike… strike… ball… etc.
lastly, everyone competing is just as good as the next person. when times of 26.059 and 26.060 decide bronze from silver –it’s time to revamp or add to these events. .001 seconds is more luck than skill in my humble opinion. if downhill skiers had to throw snowballs at targets and dodge moving obstacles, the times would vary a bit and the cream of the cream of the crop would float well above the rest.
i just don’t find myself entertained by sucky snowboarders, footraces, or throwing contests? am i simple that mature? ha!
p.s. reader: just for kicks i’ve added a picture of me and my very first bowtie. god i love old pics.

i’ve decided after years and years, that i do not like the olympics. how can one not like the olympics you ask? i feel that the olympics are childish, outdated, and most of all –not-entertaining.
childish you say? how can “the games” be childish? the top of the top, best of the best, competing for the world title: a gold metal, (yea i said childish). i grew out of footraces, distance throwing, and racing downhill in sleds while i was still in grade school. 5th graders these days are busy talking about psp games, or if who of their friends has a real playboy magazine. ice skating races, please.
there are some competitions that are not so simple, say hockey, or snow boarding. i’ve seen professional hockey, and snowboarding videos galore. the pros are super good at this stuff, but the olympic contenders aren’t pros. they suck in comparison! olympic contenders are the best amateurs at what they do. who wants to watch the best mediocre athletes? not i said the anti olympic tv viewer, not i.
events like the downhill skiing competition are interesting, for the first run. but after you see one run, you’ve seen them all. the camera angles don’t change, the costume colors may, but that’s hardly enough to captivate my adolescent attention span.
granted, the olympics were not always a waste of time. back in ancient greece, i’m sure the olympics were everyone’s year highlight. i figure that now, most of the olympics game spectators sit on their couch watching the games in-between commercials of seinfeld reruns.
but back in days of old, in order to see the games, you had to attend the games. now i’ve never sat thru an entire baseball game viewed on tv, (or an entire inning for that matter). but i love going to baseball games. the crowd, the noise, the hype, it all adds to what would be a very dull experience. strike… strike… ball… etc.
lastly, everyone competing is just as good as the next person. when times of 26.059 and 26.060 decide bronze from silver –it’s time to revamp or add to these events. .001 seconds is more luck than skill in my humble opinion. if downhill skiers had to throw snowballs at targets and dodge moving obstacles, the times would vary a bit and the cream of the cream of the crop would float well above the rest.
i just don’t find myself entertained by sucky snowboarders, footraces, or throwing contests? am i simple that mature? ha!
p.s. reader: just for kicks i’ve added a picture of me and my very first bowtie. god i love old pics.

Labels:
Hunger 1
Friday, February 24, 2006
winsort
Labels:
doodles
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Thursday, February 16, 2006
Monday, February 13, 2006
she's a brick -house
Labels:
doodles
Sunday, February 12, 2006
“if men were born with wives, every man would be a genius”
my friend sonic, he told me this quote the other day. to whom this quote deserves credit, i do not know. google could not provide the answer in less than 30 seconds, and that’s where my search for the rightful owner stopped. regardless it is neither mine nor his.
the more i thought about the quote, the more beautiful it appeared to me.
immediately, the quote: “behind every great man, stands a great woman” came to mind. the quote at the top of this post initially gives off the feel that it’s an ode to women type quote. to most, that’s where it stops. yet when you look deeper into this quote more is revealed
if men were born with wives, they in turn, would not waste precious hours and dollars in the ridiculous pursuit for wife. with ample funds, and time on each man’s hands, he would be able to get to the things that “matter”.
if every man would stop spending time and money on cologne, clothes, hotornot.com, and clubs –they would be at home inventing cures for cancer, 1000-horsepower 200-mile per gallon cars, and of course trees that really did grow money.
the quote has a shiny high-gloss finish that appears to be sweet, and pleasing the female gender from a male perspective. instead it speaks truth the only way men can say truth without getting reprimanded, by masking the real meaning behind a compliment.
men seem to always have, a hobby, sport, idea, or something other than family/women that occupy their time. generally, women don’t have ‘things’. women have clothes, shoes, food, and gossip. these are all things geared towards being mothers and/or finding a husband.
i’m 50/50 on this quote. half of me loves the method with which the person sneaks his message across by depicting his message as a compliment, when it in fact, is hardly that. secondly, i agree with the message. i would have had better grades, worked harder at my job, saved more money, and pursued ventures that remain on the back burner.
what would women be if they were born with husbands? eternally happy? bored? wives!
my friend sonic, he told me this quote the other day. to whom this quote deserves credit, i do not know. google could not provide the answer in less than 30 seconds, and that’s where my search for the rightful owner stopped. regardless it is neither mine nor his.
the more i thought about the quote, the more beautiful it appeared to me.
immediately, the quote: “behind every great man, stands a great woman” came to mind. the quote at the top of this post initially gives off the feel that it’s an ode to women type quote. to most, that’s where it stops. yet when you look deeper into this quote more is revealed
if men were born with wives, they in turn, would not waste precious hours and dollars in the ridiculous pursuit for wife. with ample funds, and time on each man’s hands, he would be able to get to the things that “matter”.
if every man would stop spending time and money on cologne, clothes, hotornot.com, and clubs –they would be at home inventing cures for cancer, 1000-horsepower 200-mile per gallon cars, and of course trees that really did grow money.
the quote has a shiny high-gloss finish that appears to be sweet, and pleasing the female gender from a male perspective. instead it speaks truth the only way men can say truth without getting reprimanded, by masking the real meaning behind a compliment.
men seem to always have, a hobby, sport, idea, or something other than family/women that occupy their time. generally, women don’t have ‘things’. women have clothes, shoes, food, and gossip. these are all things geared towards being mothers and/or finding a husband.
i’m 50/50 on this quote. half of me loves the method with which the person sneaks his message across by depicting his message as a compliment, when it in fact, is hardly that. secondly, i agree with the message. i would have had better grades, worked harder at my job, saved more money, and pursued ventures that remain on the back burner.
what would women be if they were born with husbands? eternally happy? bored? wives!
Labels:
Hunger 1
Friday, February 10, 2006
san fran
Labels:
doodles
Tuesday, February 7, 2006
house on a slant
Labels:
doodles